Use work samples matched to the responsibility, rather than relying on a broad GRC title. These are proposed evaluation exercises using synthetic or redacted material.
| Role | Practical exercise | What a convincing response should show |
|---|---|---|
| GRC platform owner | Prioritise a backlog containing an access defect, new regulatory mapping, overdue integration fix and dashboard request | Clear trade-offs, decision rights and release acceptance criteria |
| Business analyst | Convert a disputed-risk-score scenario into requirements | Actors, state changes, evidence, permissions, exceptions and testable outcomes |
| Administrator / configurator | Change an approval route without exposing restricted evidence | Supported configuration, impact analysis, test steps and rollback plan |
| Integration engineer | Diagnose duplicate or missing evidence after a failed synchronisation | Reconciliation, failure handling, monitoring and an accountable support route |
| Controls / audit specialist | Explain when an existing evidence item can be reused | Scope, period, provenance, access and review requirements |
| AI evaluation owner | Assess plausible but unsupported control mappings | Reference answers, error categories, escalation and repeatable regression tests |
EY’s advertised implementation-manager role asks for ServiceNow certifications, implementation experience and integration capability. That supports checking credentials where relevant—but our recommendation is to require demonstrated delivery judgement as well as certification. (careers.ey.com)
Sources cited on this page
- careers.ey.com ↗careers.ey.com